Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145244

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : DR01 - DR06 Full Version

Extraintestinal Salmonella Infections- An Underdiagnosed Clinical Entity: A Case Series


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66075.18843
M Jane Esther, Ronald J Bosco, Jeevaraj Giridharan, Pradhap Lenin

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Srinivasan Medical College, Tricy, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Srinivasan Medical College, Tricy, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. M Jane Esther,
All in One Labs, 22/1, Keelachatram Road, Tennur, Trichy-620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: janesweety16@gmail.com

Abstract

Extraintestinal salmonellosis can occur as a complication of enteric fever. In this case series, five clinically suspected cases of pyogenic meningitis and arthritis, a case of pyelonephritis suspected to be pyogenic or tubercular, a case of vertebral osteomyelitis suspected to be tuberculosis or malignancy, and a case of pyomyositis that clinically presented as a tumour were discussed. Although none of these cases were clinically suspected to be due to Salmonella, all were confirmed as extraintestinal salmonellosis based on microbiological evaluation. Salmonella should be suspected in acute inflammatory lesions that are unresponsive to empirical treatment. Instead of empirical antibiotics, culture and sensitivity-based antibiotics for the recommended duration are the only way to cure extraintestinal salmonellosis and prevent morbidity. Effective communication and correlation between the laboratory, clinician, and radiologist are essential for a definitive diagnosis. Histopathological and microbiological investigations should be done simultaneously to identify the definitive aetiology in all localised lesions presenting with necrosis/inflammatory response. This case series presents five cases of extraintestinal salmonellosis with serious complications, including meningitis, pyelonephritis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and pyomyositis, each with varied clinical presentations.

Keywords

Enteric, Meningitis, Osteomyelitis, Pyelonephritis, Pyomyositis

Salmonellae are ubiquitous human and animal pathogens that primarily infect the enteric tract. Infections with Salmonella in humans commonly manifest as enteric fever, food poisoning, and septicaemia, though extraintestinal salmonellosis can rarely occur as complications of enteric fever and gastroenteritis. Salmonella is transmitted through ingestion of contaminated food and water. Lower gastric acidity, previous gastrointestinal surgery, and oral antibiotic therapy that suppress normal intestinal flora are risk factors for Salmonella infection. Salmonellae enter through the epithelial cells in the intestinal mucosa, leading to alterations in the actin cytoskeleton and enclosing themselves inside vesicles through a process called bacteria-mediated endocytosis. Salmonella inside the vesicles are phagocytosed by macrophages. Salmonellae have the ability to survive inside macrophages by inducing certain alterations on the bacterial surface. Salmonellae inside macrophages enter the bloodstream via lymphatics (transient primary bacteraemia), then spread to the reticuloendothelial tissues and other organs, resulting in the onset of clinical disease (1). Both typhoidal and non typhoidal Salmonella can cause extraintestinal salmonellosis (1). Salmonella infection can present with extraintestinal manifestations such as meningitis, osteomyelitis, bacteriuria, septic arthritis, pyomyositis, and cardiovascular infections (2),(3).

Many cases of extraintestinal salmonellosis do not come to light primarily because they are not suspected. Blind treatment with antibiotics, without performing microbial culture to identify the causative organism, leads to underreporting or no reporting of the exact cause of the extraintestinal lesions. A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary for the diagnosis of extraintestinal salmonellosis. Prompt treatment for a longer duration is essential for the cure of extraintestinal infections due to Salmonella (2). There are very few reported cases of extraintestinal salmonellosis. A case series of five extraintestinal salmonellosis cases with various clinical manifestations and risk factors, which were reported over the past two years, has been presented here to emphasise the importance of appropriate diagnosis of lesions based on microbiological examinations.

Case Report

Case 1

An 18-month-old girl was brought to the paediatric department with a complaint of a seizure episode. The mother reported that the seizure was generalised, and the child became drowsy afterward. There were histories of fever and vomiting for the past two days. However, there was no history of coughing, breathlessness, or passing dark-coloured urine.

During the physical examination, a drowsy child with a temperature of 38°C was observed. Neurological examination revealed neck stiffness. A provisional diagnosis of bacterial meningitis was made. Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) samples were collected for culture, and the CSF sample was sent for biochemical tests. The baby was started on intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin.

The CSF sample appeared turbid, with protein levels at 30 mg/dL and glucose at 42 mg/dL. Microscopic examination of the CSF sample, as well as Gram stain and cytology, showed findings suggestive of pyogenic meningitis, as presented in (Table/Fig 1)a,b.

The sample was cultured on blood agar, MacConkey agar, and chocolate agar. Non lactose-fermenting gram negative bacilli were isolated in culture, which were identified as Salmonella Typhi. The identification was confirmed by positive catalase and negative oxidase tests, negative indole test, alkaline slant with acid butt and a speck of H2S, no gas in the triple sugar iron media, negative urease (Christensen urease) and citrate (Simmon’s citrate agar) tests, fermentation and motility in mannitol motility medium. The isolate showed agglutination with the antiserum that is specific for Salmonella Typhi. The organism’s identification was further confirmed using Vitek 2 compact as Salmonella Typhi. The isolate showed susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, amikacin, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, and meropenem.

However, the blood culture showed no growth after seven days of incubation in the BacTalert rapid blood culture system.

Upon repeat history, it was revealed that the child had previously suffered from typhoid about four-month-ago. The child received treatment in the hospital for three days but did not complete the prescribed course of oral antibiotics as advised by the paediatrician. The child did not attend the recommended follow-up appointments and was only brought back to the hospital after four months following a seizure episode.

The baby was diagnosed with Salmonella meningitis and initially treated with ceftriaxone and amikacin for three days. However, there was no improvement despite treatment, and the baby remained unconscious. Ceftriaxone was then replaced with meropenem. Despite continued treatment, the child unfortunately passed away on the fourth day of admission.

Case 2

A 67-year-old man presented to the medicine Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of recurrent episodes of burning micturition, painful micturition, and urinary urgency over the past three months. There was no history of fever. He had a known case of type 2 diabetes mellitus for 15 years and was taking oral antidiabetic medications. He had no history of past surgeries.

During examination, his blood pressure was measured as 126/82 mmHg. He exhibited suprapubic tenderness. A urine sample was collected and sent for microbiological examination. Microscopic examination of a wet mount revealed the presence of numerous pus cells and bacilli, as shown in (Table/Fig 2). No parasitic eggs were detected in the urine microscopy. Ziehl-Neelsen stain yielded negative results for acid-fast bacilli, as shown in (Table/Fig 3). An ultrasound of the abdomen revealed features consistent with pyelonephritis, as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Culture on MacConkey agar showed heavy growth of non lactose fermenting colonies. Blood agar displayed grey moist colonies with haemodigestion. Vitek 2 compact identified the organism as Salmonella. The organism was specifically identified as Salmonella Typhi through biochemical tests. The test organism agglutinated with Salmonella polyvalent O antisera and antisera specific for S. typhi. The strain was found to be sensitive to ceftriaxone, cefixime, cotrimoxazole, and resistant to ampicillin, nalidixic acid, and ciprofloxacin. Subsequent abdominal imaging revealed no abnormalities in the urinary tract.

Upon repeating the patient’s history, there was no recent history of loose stools or fever. Urine microscopy showed no presence of parasitic eggs, and the sample tested negative for acid-fast bacilli. Blood and stool cultures also tested negative for Salmonella.

The patient was diagnosed with Salmonella pyelonephritis and treated with oral co-trimoxazole for 14 days, resulting in symptom resolution. Periodic urine and stool cultures were carried out for six months, all of which tested negative for Salmonella.

Case 3

A 34-year-old man presented to the orthopaedic OPD with a complaint of back pain persisting for one month. There was no history of trauma or any significant medical conditions associated with back pain. The patient had no history of diabetes, hypertension, or alcoholism, and had not received treatment for any unrelated diseases.

During the physical examination, the patient was afebrile with excessive paraspinal muscle spasms. Severe tenderness was observed over the L2-L4 region. Neurological examination revealed a bilateral sensory deficit below the L4 level. An Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the spine showed spondylodiscitis of L2-L4, as depicted in (Table/Fig 5). A presumptive diagnosis of Pott’s spine was made, leading to an open disc biopsy and decompressive laminotomy in the L2-L4 region. Pus and tissue samples were collected and sent for histopathological examination, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and bacterial culture.

Histopathology revealed features of suppurative osteomyelitis, as shown in (Table/Fig 6). Ziehl-Neelsen staining yielded negative results for acid-fast bacilli, as shown in (Table/Fig 7). BacTalert culture for tuberculosis remained negative even after 42 days of incubation. Gram staining of the pus sample revealed numerous pus cells and a few gram negative bacilli, as shown in (Table/Fig 8). Bacterial culture was performed by inoculating the pus and tissue samples on blood agar and MacConkey agar. Both samples showed the growth of non lactose fermenting gram negative bacilli on MacConkey agar and grey, non haemolytic colonies on blood agar. Biochemical tests were conducted from isolated colonies of the pus and tissue samples. The test organism tested negative for oxidase, positive for catalase, negative for indole, citrate, and urease tests, motile and fermenting mannitol in mannitol motility medium, and displayed an alkaline slant with an acid butt and no gas production in triple sugar iron agar. The test organism showed agglutination with the antiserum that is specific for Salmonella Typhi, identifying it as such. Confirmation of the identification was done using Vitek 2 compact. The isolate was found to be susceptible to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, amikacin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline through the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. It was, however, resistant to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid.

Upon further questioning, the patient recalled experiencing fever and loose stools for a week approximately three months ago. However, he did not seek medical help and instead self-medicated with paracetamol and an antidiarrhoeal drug. Blood culture was performed but yielded negative results. The sickling test was also negative.

The patient was diagnosed with Salmonella osteomyelitis. Treatment involved intravenous administration of ceftriaxone and amikacin for three weeks, followed by oral cefuroxime for six weeks. After completing the treatment, the patient became asymptomatic and had successful follow-up.

Case 4

A 65-year-old male patient presented to the orthopaedic department with complaints of sudden onset severe pain and restricted movements in his left knee over the past four days. There were no reported histories of fever, trauma, or other illnesses. The patient had a known history of diabetes for the past 10 years and was taking medications, though his blood sugar levels were not well controlled. There was no suggestive history of haemolytic anaemia.

Upon examination, the patient was conscious, oriented, and afebrile. His left knee exhibited medial enlargement with a swelling measuring 8×8 cm. The area was erythematous, severely tender, and firm in consistency, with restricted movements. Haemogram results showed a haemoglobin level of 13 g/dL. The peripheral smear revealed neutrophilic leukocytosis and toxic changes, with no evidence of haemolytic anaemia. Random blood sugar was measured at 280 mg/dL. X-ray of the left knee showed features consistent with infective arthritis, as shown in (Table/Fig 9). Pus was aspirated from the left knee and sent for cytology and microbiological examination. The cytology findings were suggestive of infective arthritis, as depicted in (Table/Fig 10).

Gram staining of the pus sample revealed the presence of numerous pus cells and gram negative bacilli. Bacterial culture was conducted by inoculating the sample on blood agar and MacConkey agar. The growth of non lactose fermenting gram negative bacilli was observed on MacConkey agar, while grey, moist, and non haemolytic colonies were seen on blood agar. Biochemical tests were performed from isolated colonies, which indicated that the test organism was negative for oxidase and positive for catalase. It also tested negative for indole, citrate, and urease, but was found to be motile and capable of fermenting mannitol in mannitol motility medium. In triple sugar iron agar, the organism displayed an alkaline slant with an acid butt and no gas production. Additionally, the test organism agglutinated with specific antiserum for Salmonella Typhi. As a result, the bacterium was identified as Salmonella Typhi, with confirmation from Vitek 2 compact. Susceptibility testing using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method indicated that the isolate was susceptible to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, amikacin, gentamycin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline. However, it exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid.

Upon further questioning, the patient stated that he could not recall experiencing any episodes of fever or loose stools in the past few months. Blood culture, stool culture, and Widal tests were performed, all of which yielded negative results.

The patient was diagnosed with Salmonella arthritis and received treatment consisting of joint debridement, along with one week of intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin, followed by three weeks of oral cotrimoxazole. The affected knee was subjected to repeat aspiration. After completing the treatment, the patient became asymptomatic and remained disease-free during the six-month follow-up period.

Case 5

A 40-year-old male presented to the orthopaedic OPD with complaints of pain in his left thigh over the past three days. The patient reported that the pain had started suddenly and he noticed some swelling upon touch. There was no history of fever, and the patient did not have a known history of diabetes or hypertension.

During the examination, the patient’s oral temperature was found to be within the normal range. His pulse rate was 84/min, and his blood pressure was measured at 124/80 mmHg. Examination of the left thigh revealed a warm, tender, and fluctuant swelling measuring approximately 4×3×2 cm upon palpation of the upper lateral aspect. An X-ray was performed, which showed the presence of an intramuscular lesion in the upper and lateral aspect of the left thigh, as depicted in (Table/Fig 11).

Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) was performed, resulting in the drainage of pus, and the sample was sent for microbiological examination. The patient was empirically started on i.v. vancomycin. Histopathological examination findings were consistent with acute pyomyositis, as shown in (Table/Fig 12).

Gram staining revealed the presence of numerous pus cells and a moderate number of gram negative bacilli (Table/Fig 13). Ziehl-Neelsen staining showed no acid-fast bacilli, as depicted in (Table/Fig 14). Bacterial culture was conducted by inoculating the sample on blood agar and MacConkey agar. MacConkey agar showed the growth of non lactose fermenting gram negative bacilli, while blood agar exhibited the growth of grey and moist non haemolytic colonies. The test organism tested negative for oxidase and positive for catalase. It was also negative for indole, citrate, and urease tests, but displayed motility and fermentation of mannitol in mannitol motility medium. In triple sugar iron agar, the organism showed an alkaline slant with an acid butt and no gas production, as illustrated in (Table/Fig 15). Additionally, the test organism agglutinated with the specific antiserum for Salmonella Typhi. Hence, the bacterium was identified as Salmonella Typhi, with confirmation from Vitek 2 compact. Susceptibility testing using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method indicated that the isolate was susceptible to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, amikacin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and doxycycline. A final diagnosis of Salmonella pyomyositis was established.

The patient denied experiencing any episodes of fever or loose stools in the past year. Treatment involved a two-week course of intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin, followed by a two-week course of oral ciprofloxacin. After completing the treatment, the patient became asymptomatic. Regular follow-up was conducted for six months, during which the patient remained asymptomatic.

A summarised overview of the clinical findings, investigational results, treatment, and follow-up for the discussed cases in the series has been presented in (Table/Fig 16).

Discussion

Salmonellae are gram negative bacilli and facultative anaerobes belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. They commonly cause intestinal manifestations but can also lead to extraintestinal infections (3). However, extraintestinal Salmonellosis is often under reported and underdiagnosed. The primary mode of transmission for Salmonella is fecal-oral. Sudhaharan S et al., reported Salmonella osteomyelitis as the most common extraintestinal manifestation of Salmonella (2). Among the Salmonella species, Salmonella Typhi is the most frequent cause of extraintestinal infections, according to Sudhaharan S et al., (2). In the present case series, all the patients experienced extraintestinal infections caused by Salmonella Typhi.

Salmonella meningitis typically occurs in neonates and infants. It is not as common as meningitis caused by bacteria like Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, but some cases have been reported. In the study by Nwadike VU et al., CSF examination showed a normal cell count, while in the current case, a high neutrophil count similar to septic meningitis was observed (4). Meningitis caused by Salmonella carries a high morbidity and mortality rate (4). Risk factors for Salmonella infection include fecal-oral transmission from a carrier mother or caretaker, as well as ingestion of breast milk from a Salmonella-infected mother (5). In the present case, the mother could not be evaluated for carrier status due to the child’s death.

Contact with pet reptiles has also been reported as a risk factor for Salmonella meningitis, particularly due to Salmonella rubislaw (5). Although previous case reports have documented rare Salmonella species such as Salmonella Newport and Salmonella enteric serotype Houtenae, the patient in present case suffered from meningitis caused by Salmonella Typhi (6),(7). Children who survive Salmonella meningitis are at a higher risk of experiencing complications such as seizures, hydrocephalus, empyemas, retardation, paresis, athetosis, and visual disturbances. When gram negative bacteria are observed in CSF, the possibility of Salmonella should be considered. Treatment of choice involves intravenous administration of third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones for at least three weeks (8). In patients with cerebral abscesses, it is recommended to continue treatment for at least five weeks (8).

Salmonella osteomyelitis refers to an infection of the bone caused by Salmonella. The incidence of osteomyelitis is less than 1% of all Salmonella infections (9). In India, Salmonella Typhi is the most common cause of Salmonella osteomyelitis. The infection typically occurs through haematogenous seeding of the bones following a bloodstream infection, which is likely the cause in present case. Rarely, it can also result from penetrating trauma or spread from a nearby site. Present case is similar to a case report by Rohilla R et al., where no predisposing factors such as sickle cell disease, diabetes, immunosuppressive states, connective tissue disorders and extremes of age were present (9),(10).

Incomplete antibiotic treatment or lack of appropriate antibiotic therapy, as seen in the patient who self-medicated for fever and loose stools without medical guidance, increases the risk of Salmonella osteomyelitis and other extraintestinal manifestations (10). The appropriate treatment of enteric fever with the right antibiotics for the recommended duration can help prevent Salmonella osteomyelitis. Treatment options for Salmonella osteomyelitis include cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and quinolones, administered for a minimum of 3-6 weeks depending on the results of antibiotic susceptibility tests (9),(10),(11). In patients with a history of previous fever and loose stools, a higher index of suspicion should be maintained for Salmonella as the causative agent (10). Therefore, when evaluating suspected cases of osteomyelitis, it is important to include a history of fever and loose stools within the past 3-6 months in the checklist.

Salmonella can also cause Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). The bacteria can enter the urinary tract through hematogenous seeding or direct spread from the urethra due to fecal contamination (12). The symptoms of Salmonella UTIs are similar to those caused by other bacteria. While Salmonella UTIs often occur in individuals with anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract, some cases may not have any predisposing factors. Risk factors for Salmonella UTIs include renal stones, nephrocalcinosis, renal cysts, urethral strictures, Schistosomiasis, renal neoplasms, renal transplantation, tuberculosis, prostatic hypertrophy, lupus nephritis, and cystoscopic procedures. However, in the cases reported by Dawar R et al., and Klosterman SA the patients had urinary tract abnormalities, whereas the patient did not (12),(13).

Complications of Salmonella UTIs include interstitial nephritis, renal micro-abscesses, and pyelonephritis (12),(13). Various species of Salmonella have been isolated from cases of Salmonella bacteriuria, including Salmonella Typhi, I#IS. I?Iparatyphi A, I#IS. I?Iparatyphi B, I#IS. I?Ityphimurium, I#IS. I?Ivirchow, I#IS. I?Ichester, I#IS. I?Ihedelberg, I#IS. I?Icholerasuis, I#IS. I?Ieastbourne, S. enterica sub sp. enterica, I#IS. I?Ienteritidis, I#IS. I?Ioranienberg, I#IS. I?Imanhaten, and I#IS. I?INewport (14). It is important to note that treating suspected UTIs without conducting a culture and sensitivity test can result in the underdiagnosis of infections caused by uncommon pathogens like Salmonella. Therefore, Salmonella bacteriuria should be considered in patients with a history of fever and loose stools, as enteric fever can lead to urinary carriers. A high degree of clinical suspicion and avoidance of blind antimicrobial treatment without identifying the causative organisms can help prevent the underdiagnosis of UTIs caused by Salmonella.

Salmonella can cause septic arthritis, and the clinical symptoms are similar to those caused by other bacteria. Avascular necrosis is the most common predisposing factor, with the hip joint being the most commonly affected in cases of Salmonella septic arthritis. Other risk factors include immunosuppression and prolonged steroid treatment. Shanthi M et al., reported a case of Salmonella septic arthritis in a patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) who was predisposed to immunosuppression due to steroid therapy. In the patient’s case, they had diabetes, which is an immunosuppressive condition. Most cases of septic arthritis are caused by non typhoidal Salmonella, but there have been rare reports of typhoidal arthritis, similar to the present case (15).

Like the case described by Shanthi M et al., the patient had negative blood culture, Widal test, and stool cultures, most likely due to a long latency period (15). Therefore, culture of pus from the infected joint is the ideal diagnostic investigation for septic arthritis caused by Salmonella. The main steps in managing septic arthritis due to Salmonella involve surgical intervention and antibiotic therapy based on drug sensitivity reports. The duration of antibiotic treatment may range from 2 to 6 weeks depending on the severity of the infection. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in preventing extensive joint damage (2),(15).

Intramuscular abscesses can occur as extraintestinal manifestations of Salmonella. While pyomyositis due to Salmonella is rare, non typhoidal Salmonella are commonly associated with pyomyositis (16). Salmonella enterica subspp. enterica has been found to cause neck abscesses in diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control (17). Salmonella Paratyphi A has been reported as a rare cause of pyomyositis, as described in the case report by Bhosale A and Kolte S in one of the patients, Salmonella Typhi was isolated (18). Thyroid abscesses have been associated with Salmonella enterica serotype Panama and Salmonella Typhimurium (19). Salmonella has also been isolated from cases of gluteal abscess, ovarian abscess, liver abscess, splenic abscess, and pelvic abscesses (2). When treating patients with abscesses, it is essential to perform a culture and sensitivity test on the pus sample obtained through incision and drainage or aspiration. Blind antibiotic therapy can lead to the overlooking of rare causes such as Salmonella.

Salmonella has also been isolated in cases of myelitis, cellulitis, necrotising fasciitis, empyema, pericarditis, vasculitis, and digital gangrene (2). Accurate diagnosis of extraintestinal Salmonellosis requires the exact identification of the causative organism through culture of the appropriate clinical specimen before initiating antibiotic treatment. Early treatment for the recommended duration is necessary to prevent relapse and other irreversible complications.

Conclusion

Salmonellosis should be considered as a possible diagnosis in any extraintestinal infection. Histopathological findings in infectious diseases are typically non specific. If empirical antibiotic therapy fails to show improvement, it should raise suspicion for tuberculosis, malignancy, and other atypical presentations of infectious diseases, including salmonellosis. What makes this case series unique is that none of the five cases were initially suspected to be caused by Salmonella. Meningitis, pyelonephritis, and septic arthritis were initially suspected to be caused by other common pyogenic bacteria. Osteomyelitis and pyomyositis were clinically and radiologically suspected to be tuberculosis or malignancy. The correct diagnosis was ultimately made through microbial culture. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of extraintestinal Salmonella infections with appropriate antibiotics, based on sensitivity reports, for the recommended duration can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality due to serious complications.

References

1.
Sastry AS, Bhat KS. Essentials of Medical Microbiology. 4 th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee brothers; 2023.
2.
Sudhaharan S, Padmaja K, Solanki R, Lakshmi V, Umabala P, Aparna B. Extra- intestinal salmonellosis in a tertiary care center in South India. J Infect Dev Ctries.2014;8(7):831-37. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Giannella RA. Salmonella. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th ed. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 21.
4.
Nwadike VU, Fowotade A, Tuta KE, Olusanya OO. A rare case of Salmonella typhi meningitis in an eleven month old infant: A case report. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2012;10(1):38-39.
5.
Moffatt CR, Lafferty AR, Khan S, Krsteski R, Valcanis M, Powling J, et al. Salmonella Rubislaw gastroenteritis linked to a pet lizard. Med J Aust. 2010;193(1):54-55. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Nimir AR, Ibrahim R, Ibrahim IA. Salmonella meningitis in a paediatric patient caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Houtenae. BMJ Case Rep. 2011:2011;bcr0420114096. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Malet AD, Ingerto S, Ganan I. Meningitis caused by Salmonella newport in a five-year-old child. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2016;2016:2145805. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ahmed B, Jarallah AA, Asiri A, Hanash AA, Maely AA, Ogran H, et al. Salmonella meningitis presenting with multiple microabscesses in the brain in a young infant: A case report. Int J Clin Paediatr. 2016;5(1):13-14. [crossref]
9.
McAnearney S, McCall D. Salmonella osteomyelitis. Ulster Med J. 2015;84(3):171-72.
10.
Rohilla R, Bhatia M, Gupta P, Singh A, Shankar R, Omar BJ. Salmonella osteomyelitis: A rare extraintestinal manifestation of an endemic pathogen. J Lab Physicians. 2019;11(2):164-70. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Salem KH. Salmonella osteomyelitis: A rare differential diagnosis in osteolytic lesions around the knee. J Infect Public Health. 2014;7(1):66-69. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Dawar R, Jasuja S, Imdadi F, Ghonge N. Salmonella typhi bacteriuria, predispositions and complications: Two case reports and review of literature. World J Nephrol Urol. 2017;6(3-4):32-34. [crossref]
13.
Klosterman SA. Salmonella-related urinary tract infection in an elderly patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014204552. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Yeung EYH. A case-control study on the association between Salmonella bacteriuria and cystoscopy. Infect Dis Rep. 2021;13(1):205-14. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Shanthi M, Sekar U, Sridharan KS. Septic arthritis of hip caused by Salmonella typhi: A case report. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2012;2012:464527. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Aravamudan VM, Fong PK, Singh P, Chin JS, Sam YS, Tambyah PA. Extraintestinal Salmonellosis in the immunocompromised: An unusual case of pyomyositis. Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:5030961. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Akkoyunlu Y, Ceylan B, Iraz M, Elmadag NM, Aslan T. Muscle abscess due to Salmonella enterica. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(7):605-07. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Bhosale A, Kolte S. Primary iliopsoas abscess caused by Salmonella paratyphi A- A rare case. J Clinical Diagnostic Res. 2018;12(10):PD03-PD04. [crossref]
19.
Gudipati S, Westblom TU. Salmonellosis initially seen as a thyroid abscess. Head and Neck. 1991;13(2):153-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66075.18843

Date of Submission: Jun 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 07, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 20, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 13, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com